top of page

Bridging the Knowledge Gap in SOC 2 Audits Year by Year

In the ever-evolving landscape of SOC 2 audits, one challenge often overlooked is the knowledge gap that forms from one year to the next. This gap emerges due to changes in regulations, evolving threats, and personnel turnover. For our audit team, addressing this issue was particularly daunting as we had experienced three turnovers in the position that served as the bridge between our Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) and the audit team. This instability introduced a high level of uncertainty and training difficulties for new hires, exacerbating our knowledge gap problem.

Our previous approach to dealing with this issue was far from ideal. Traditional documentation methods like spreadsheets and emails proved to be insufficient, leading to bottlenecks, miscommunication, and inconsistent practices. The lack of a structured framework for documenting control mechanisms made it challenging to maintain consistency from one year to the next.

However, our solution came in the form of's game plan. This innovative tool allowed us to document control owners, control descriptions, test of control procedures, and how our company would execute these controls.

Control Ownership: With, we could easily assign control ownership to individuals or teams, ensuring clear accountability. This feature helped maintain consistency and transparency in the audit process, even in the face of personnel turnover.

Control Descriptions: provided a structured framework to describe each control. This description not only ensured clarity but also made it easier to understand and implement controls year after year.

Test of Control: The tool streamlined the test of control procedures, making it simpler to track which controls needed testing and when. We could also record the results of each control test, making it easier to track historical data, irrespective of personnel changes.

Execution Plans: Perhaps the most powerful feature was the ability to define how our company would execute controls. This was a game-changer when it came to bridging the knowledge gap because it provided a step-by-step plan for control implementation, ensuring new hires got up to speed more efficiently.'s game plan played a pivotal role in addressing the knowledge gap year by year:

Continuity: The game plan ensured continuity in understanding control mechanisms. Even with personnel turnover, standardized documentation and execution plans were readily available, promoting consistent practices and understanding.

Collaboration: fostered collaboration among audit teams. They could discuss, modify, and enhance control descriptions and execution plans collaboratively, ensuring that the collective knowledge of the team was captured and shared, reducing the impact of personnel changes.

Efficiency: By streamlining the documentation of control ownership, descriptions, test procedures, and execution plans, the tool significantly increased the efficiency of the audit process. This meant less time spent on administrative tasks and more on in-depth auditing.

Historical Data: One of the most valuable aspects was the ability to easily access historical data. This was a crucial component of bridging the knowledge gap. Audit teams could review previous years' data to identify trends, areas of improvement, or recurring issues, regardless of who was in the liaison role.

In summary,'s game plan was a game-changer when it came to addressing the knowledge gap in SOC 2 audits, especially in environments with high personnel turnover. By providing a structured, collaborative, and efficient platform for documenting controls, it ensured that our audit processes remained consistent and effective year after year. We bid farewell to the uncertainties of personnel changes and welcomed a more reliable SOC 2 audit process. Happy auditing!

bottom of page